of the loop of the tie and the only way left to transgress
do not know if a dress "smart" gives greater dignity / prestige to the person wearing it, actually it is a question on which I racked my brains over and over again without ever having dissolved my doubts about it (despite several hours and half hours have remained bloodless on the battlefield).
Some say that I, elegant dress, I'm fine. What consoles me only to a certain point, a little 'how to tell a prisoner "lines orizzonatali you donate, seem less thin." This is because, in fact, I have always appreciated the freedom not to dress "smart". That does not mean concerts as a beggar, be sloppy, careless or sloppy, it means simply ignoring a dress code that includes stringent rules to compose the dress of an individual from a well-defined and restricted to animals, whose features extend in a very narrow space, and whose reports are stylistic and chromatic predetermined. Probably not rule it out, I am inclined to reject the "code" is not natural for a libertarian spirit that invites me to not bend to the compromises that our culture of citizens and before that "consumers in search of happiness, or statement of profit and personal expense, even before about it, other ", but rather to accept and conform to another" code "that probably was brought by a language more persuasive to my ears.
fact, talking about my "dress", which is probably not one of the many vagaries of the fashion business, which is also just as rigidly codified and more in line with my inclinations, perhaps only because the proposal through models in which I am better able to identify.
Then, I think even those who reject certain codes and I realize that the transgression of certain rules, too, is completely encrypted. One of the tragedies of our age, which emptied of meaning in many battles start, it is that the transgression has become a purely commercial phenomenon. It is simply outrageous fashion, it is even out of fashion "not outrageous". But this is one of my strong points and now this is what I want to talk, we remain on clothing (Illi would be proud of me, I just rejected the temptation to change the subject, is going on, I'm maturing!). Then we resume the thread.
many girls who claim to be immune to passing fashions and more mainstream behavioral react to these clothes in a way that they are exempt, but simply to answer a different model. What can I infer from this? That we are not free to express ourselves and that in any direction we turn our expressiveness, however, we are referring to models clearly codified. So we can do is jump from one model to another? Some schemes collapsed in the exact moment when you realize the rules that underpin and contours that are defined. For such dreams is so. When, during a dream, we realize that we are living a dream, the fictional world around us collapses. From that moment we can choose to wake up, continue the dream by imposing our rules (at this point, however, speaks of a particular type of dream, lucid dream), to save the game or change the channel. E (very simplified) sometimes has been so for totalitarian regimes: when the people took note of the grim situation of exploitation in which paid, controlled by a mass of arrogant despots, then broke revolutions that have swept those same regimes. But slice the trunk in the second digression (now I'm definitely in shape) and away "ball" on the post. This does not apply in fashion and especially for those who object to the way we dress. On the contrary, I see no way out if not too tight openings.
exaggerating my argument, I'm thinking, leaving out the "code" only those who are insensitive models that the media (in all its possible ramifications sprawling) directly or indirectly offer us and force us (the field is reduced to a very small number of people). And as a rebuttal to identify these "anarchists" might identify them as those who, anyone who follows a code (embody the expression of a fashion) does not recognize them as units within their category.
In the case of clothing, then, we might conclude that the only truly free are those that are recognized as being poorly dressed or are not recognized as best dressed from virtually all others. In this category, but I can include only the real beggars and naked men. Do I have to
waiting for the bus stop with Zebedee ranging to faint breath of wind to feel truly free? The price of freedom is the price of humiliation? But to what extent the nonconformity is a way out and not a trap door to a new "code"? Until the moment you consciously ignore the code that surrounds us. But this, as you'll see you too, in the world of global media is impossible. In short, the evidence of the strength of the system is in its widespread dissemination prior to being in our habits and our gestures, in our thoughts.
If we are not aware humor him, if we are aware we continue to support him by conforming to it or persists in denying it. However affects us. However, the system wins. But this is not my blog, but the movie Matrix, then I must leave to run to answer the phone ringing insistently in the cab on the street corner.
