features an interview with St. Teresa Villa Forcades y, a Benedictine monk, a doctor specializing in Medicine Internal, specializing obtained at the State University of New York and a doctorate in Public Health at the University of Barcelona, \u200b\u200babout swine flu and its vaccine. The interview is on youtube, the link carryover (
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0JqQyl09zQ&feature=related ). Who knew English, or English (the video is subtitled), went to see him directly. Otherwise, below you, I transcribed the interview in Italian. The translation is a friend of mine, Simon Scannell, thank you. It 'a document, in my opinion, very important, that sheds light on many aspects and poses many questions, even disturbing, the treatment of influenza and its vaccine from international institutions (WHO) and governments of various countries. Here is the text:
" First you need to dispute the title saddled the influence of new viruses and / or special is not so apparent from the charts that same category (A influenza virus Seasonal, more common than the other two categories viral B and C, where vaccination is not carried out annually). So, one might say that this flu is new to the antigens (the emaglutinina, H, and neuraminidase, N) : But no, because the same virus group, has already infected the world population in 1918, killing about 20,000,000 people. * The virus in question stood until the mid-'50s, then disappeared in '57 and thereafter, the virus appeared again in '77, because of a synthesized in the laboratory: it was found the body of an Inuit woman ( Eskimo) died of the A-H1N1, frozen in ice, and its tissues were extrapolated to the virus. After 77, then, this virus becomes part of the complex of seasonal influenza. What's new in this influence today? Again there is the strain (S-OIV), unknown so far. This new strain was diagnosed for the first time April 17, 2009 (two cases in California), and since then he began to speak of a new flu .. Another thing to keep in mind is that from 17 April to 15 September (day of the interview, or at least last day on which he has read the data) in the world there were 137 deaths, over 2,600 cases of infection (the English translation is wrong); period in which influenza has already hit the people in the Southern Hemisphere, which were in the middle of winter (the seasons being reversed). What is missing, then, is that the mortality of this influence is very low, even less than the normal seasonal flu. Also according to the scientific community, 1 / 3 of people over the age of 60 years have already been immunized with this virus.
Let's look at two very strange circumstances, which remained unexplained, the discovery of the new virus "at the end of January '09, and before the discovery of the virus, Baxter Pharmaceuticals, a U.S. company with several factories in Austria, distributed in 4 countries Europe (Austria, Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany) 72 kg (can not quantify the number of vaccines, but it is thousands and thousands of doses) of influenza vaccines normal. Fortunately, a Czech company technician, Bio Test, which had received the handouts, created of his own further evidence on vaccines before deployment: the vaccine in some animals (ferrets, that are used since 1918 to test flu vaccines), who all died. Deeply impressed by the result of tests made after further analysis on the material, coming to find that co-existed in the vaccine 2 live virus (the avian influenza virus, influenza which appeared in 2005, which had characteristics as an index of high mortality, but a very low rate of infection: 250 dead, on about 600 cases of infection and the seasonal flu virus, characterized by low mortality, less than 1%, but by a high rate of infection), if these two viruses are placed in a single tube, which is distributed to thousands of people, you are maximizing the probability that these two viruses mix, creating a virus from high mortality and high infectivity. Baxter has not refuted the article's reporter, has even admitted as described above. It may have happened by chance? This is highly unlikely, because the laboratories that synthesize the virus for vaccines work with certain levels of Bio-safety, and for this type of operation using the Level 3, Maxim, this means that those who work in these laboratories knows exactly what passes through their hands. It is also not only the mixture of two viruses that strange, as if these two were not enough live virus (in fact in all vaccine viruses are alive) were not treated with radiation, which attenuate enhances the effect. The journalist has not only denounced the Baxter, but also the WHO (World Health Organization: WHO, World Health Organization, a United Nations agency) and the government of the countries involved, because, with the data at our disposal, it is more likely to think badly to believe that a coincidence of events incredible (but it is important to emphasize the difference between the objective data rather than guesswork). Furthermore, we must add that this is one of the laboratories in charge of the vaccine this year. The second of the irregularities mentioned above, is as follows: we said that April 17 was diagnosed the first case of influenza A-H1N1, April 29 (12 days later) M. Chan, Director-General of WHO, announced publicly that we had a worldwide alert of 5 (penultimate step on the ladder, before level 6, in which one lives in a pandemic, inter alia, declared after one month: 11 June), for the prevention of a pandemic. We can ask ourselves how the WHO was able to declare a pandemic when the virus has a mortality rate lower than the normal annual flu. How come we do not have a pandemic every year? The answer is that in the month of May '09, the WHO changed the definition of a pandemic by "simultaneous infection of an infectious agent, present in different countries at the same time and with significant mortality, than the number of people infected, "the only definition side without the above-mentioned mortality! To end this first part of the debate in the U.S., because of the June 11 declaration of a pandemic, it has been declared National Emergency Medical Services , which has a whole series of political and social consequences. This was achieved despite the U.S., so far, there had been only 20 cases of infection with 0 deaths. In addition, in June or July (can not remember), the WHO stopped the laboratory test to determine if people were affected by influenza virus or not. In the UK, for example, the infection is established through a test phone. So, it is important to know How does WHO collect data on infection, which are then made public. Now would be useful to discuss the political and social consequences of the declaration of a pandemic. The WHO is an international organization that normally emanates medical recommendations, this means that every country is independent then decide for itself, all that changed in 2005, was listed as an exception in the event of a pandemic is under the sovereignty countries: the WHO does not give off more recommendations, but orders (all justified, but with the old definition ...). What is happening now? The governing body are waiting for the WHO to decide on the vaccine, if made compulsory or not. How can I be forced to accept a vaccine that does not want to do? Well, in the event of a global pandemic (which is not this, however, the case), if a person becomes immune to the effects of the virus, maybe you can infect those around him. And the national bodies should ensure that the law is respected ... But how? Fine or jail! In Massachusetts, where they are preparing the document for public vaccination, the penalty for those who do not comply with the requirement would amount to $ 1,000 per day of non-vaccination. Another example, which already is implemented, is that some companies (in USA, UK, France ...) have issued a document which stated that if workers wanted to continue working for them were vaccinated mandatory. A bit 'of confusion has arisen, also, what kind of vaccine was required (because the swine had not yet arrived, and then no one could be vaccinated), but in fact the vaccines required are three: one for the season and 2 for swine (the WHO has recommended the workshops to create the vaccine in 2 doses). You have to know the factors that distinguish the annual vaccine, from the specific to the swine, are mainly three: the first, mentioned above, is that the WHO has recommended that the laboratories to create the vaccine in 2 doses (although a minority of laboratories, already announced that it will emit in a single dose). In this way, theoretically, even to take up the subject of the above multiply by 3 the possibility of having non-desired side effects after injection of three live viruses (although attenuated). The second new feature, has to do with carriers: report as the French Union of Medical Nursing. For example, reading the contents of this document to the complaint, the pharmaceutical company Glaxo Smith Kline, one that is producing the vaccine and the head of the study on children that is taking place in Spain (was pioneering, who accepted testing vaccines for children 6 months of age) to see what side effects will have on them, is using an agent ever used so far. An adjuvant is stronger than normal, despite be used on children. What is an adjuvant? An adjuvant is a substance that is generally added to vaccines to stimulate and excite the immune system, immune to produce more action, this is done because the vaccine is effective from the beginning. In this case, the French nurse, reported that the adjuvant which will go to use is 10 times stronger than normal, it mixes agents such as squalene and polysorbate (the same used with the anthrax and the soldiers of the Gulf War ). It 'been shown that the latter, especially with regard to the soldiers, has caused serious damage to the central nervous system, paralysis, arthritis. This, then, is the second innovations: the use of adjuvants never experienced so far, the drug companies are justified in saying that as must produce millions of doses of vaccine (on balance of 4.6 billion doses to vaccinate most of the world's population, even those who can not afford it, by "donation" of the richest countries and the manufacturers) in this way may include less antigens. ANTIGENS NOT MORE 'HELPING: less stimulation of the immune system and more natural artificial excitement, this is the official justification. In addition, few people know that excessive excitation of the artificial immune system can cause autoimmune diseases. In fact there is one, known as paralysis ascending Guillain-Barre Syndrome (which can lead to death), which was following the administration of influenza vaccine in the U.S. in 1976 (with a campaign similar to that of today, by media and politicians) in this campaign was given influenza vaccine to 48 million Americans and of these, about 3,000 have claimed to have Guillain-Barre syndrome. This thing has been accepted as a consequence and, similarly, now CDC (Centre for Disease, Control and Prevention) American express themselves in such a way (that is, there are certainly cases of paralysis resulting from the vaccine ...) . The third innovation is that pharmaceutical companies have requested an agreement (and already received in the U.S.) because of these extraordinary efforts to produce vaccine in record time, that absolves them (criminally and financially) from any side effects of the vaccine, even if they lead to the death of the individual. In the U.S., K. Sibelius, Minister of Health, signed a document with pharmaceutical companies to ensure their impunity (political immunity) and make it impossible to ask them (or the politicians involved) compensation for damages. This is the third innovation, which I believe to be very important, since the health and life can not be bought with money, but if the pharmaceutical company or the person responsible is prepared to compensate for any damage, this can be perceived as an additional warranty. If people were made known, with public documents and pages, the impossibility of compensation, they would realize that is failing in a fundamental guarantee that the vaccine that you submit will not have undesirable side effects. To tie the third innovation, with the foregoing, the case Baxter to be more precise, as we have seen if the vaccine might be contaminated (and has been shown that it is! We do not know why and how objectively, but the fact that been contaminated is certain), and if those vaccines were used, today we would have a real pandemic (this is with a basis in reality, even if triggered by man). Other than that today, which is heralded without any foundation. EVEN have to ask WHY 'THE PRESS INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL OR I HAVE NOT TALKED about this, but so be it' ... short, knowing what happened in January and now knowing how the law of the WHO, the danger that these vaccines that are coming and that may be contaminated, using a law enforcement, can be imposed compulsorily population ( and, I add, it is impossible to ask for a punishment, the legal standard for those who has produced / promoted but also lied about the vaccine), this is a risk that can not be minimized. Just as, rightly, should not be promoted panic among the population, but account is to create a panic, the other is free to inform the citizen (as it is doing). There is no certainty, but the suspicion is in order. If it were possible, the vaccine should be studied by an independent laboratory.
What would happen now if more people start dying? Or if the virus, as announced, would change? It 's very important to know that is almost 70 years that the virus does not change. So how is it possible that a mutation has been announced for this year?! Not investigate this, but take a case, as already said, that many people begin to die, in this case, More than ever, it is important not to make the vaccine, for two main reasons: first, that if this virus increases its mortality, because it is not the same! Will have changed, maybe, but definitely not the same as what we now have the data. And if it is mutated, then, the vaccine is useless! So if it dies a part of the population do not have to be vaccinated because they are higher risks of side effects caused by the vaccine than the rates of death, but if it starts to die a considerable proportion of the population, this may be due to two reasons: first, as already mentioned, is that the virus has mutated, and therefore it is useless make a vaccine for a virus old, or is that another or several other viruses, for which this vaccine is of little value (and, possibly, could be the same route of transmission of influenza vaccine, see if Baxter) . This is the thought occurs to me, and I conclude with a dual proposal: on the one hand, it must remain calm, use the usual precautions not to get any kind of infection, and non-vaccinated! In addition to common sense, is also recommended by doctors and nurses, as already seen. The second part of the proposal: it had not received clear and neutral information about this flu, I started working last week with Religio Catalunya (http://blocs.catalunyareligio.cat/) at their request, and on this website will provide a document to sign which I call the people to put at our disposal all the medical and legal resources to avoid, mainly two things in our country (Spain!): this vaccine is required for the population, and that those who freely decide to be vaccinated are returned FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, or being able to claim financial reimbursement or at least in legal action in case of unexpected and unpleasant side effects (such as serious illness or death).
should not be afraid of swine flu, because it has even lower mortality than seasonal, for example in Europe, in the years which is fine (because the flu is not the same every year, some go well while in others it is more deadly) die for influenza or for reasons attributable to it, 40,000 people over the years in which influenza is heavier than we even 220,000 deaths. Unfortunately, in all that has been said, you can find some elements that may induce fear, scare, and I think this concern is good is not good, and instead delegate all political action. Now there is still time, has not yet been declared a National Health Alert (also in Spain!), Which, among other things, would not be justified by the data at our disposal. So we are given the opportunity to act politically in our country to ensure these two fundamental rights are guaranteed.
Finally I would add (not to treat it directly during the debate on the influence) just another footnote to the affair, even to say what I think of everything ... From the beginning of human history has seen the emergence of groups who wanted to rule the world, there is nothing new ... Romans, the Incas and all the other empires, perhaps with good intentions, for heaven's sake ... All said that the world was a chaotic collection, difficult to control, so they took permission from the people to govern them this chaos, to help humanity. And so for a while 'time now, the world faces problems of overcrowding. So, if you add too the above assumptions, the fears are not entirely unjustified. There were many people who irresponsibly brought war and destruction on our planet, people who could be stopped by political action, but were left free to do. We are in XXI century, and people were always the same ... Therefore not be excluded a priori, the possibility that this is not just a fortuitous coincidence, but something more complicated. On reflection, to speak of genocide, conspiracy world is a bit 'counter-productive and, indeed, now I regret having said it! I think, however, is very important what I said at the beginning, which is endorsed by public documents, evidence, by facts and is sufficient for a person with intellect, taking its social responsibility and choice in their consciousness in their actions. I do not care about the drivers, those are subjective, I'm interested in talking about facts and data, objectively verifiable, as the A-H1N1 vaccine will arrive in a few weeks. It 's a matter of democracy, for example, here in Catalonia, a few years ago, I was part of the popular legislative initiative (for which you must collect at least 50,000 signatures) to indicate to consumers what they were, or not, transgenic products (Spain is the largest European grower) who were going to buy. Well were collected 102,000 signatures, just in Catalonia, who supported the people's initiative ... Well, despite this, the Catalan Parliament is not even taken into consideration the proposal, it was just discussed! This is just an example to understand what I mean when I say "to monitor the quality of our democracy." There is one formal, but in practice seems to be more than a dictatorship.
[Here speaks of Aznar and the attacks in Madrid highlights the fact that people are not panicked, as happened in the U.S., shortly before the election. Fact underlined by the community internationally as a positive example.]
Well, we did it once (referring to what is written in square brackets), we can do it again (relative to vaccination of swine)! "
St. Teresa Villa y Forcades
